Participants.

400 and you may eighty-around three users was basically hired out of a massive college within the Hong-kong through adverts released within the campus and halls, bulk letters courtesy departments and you can attributes, and you may snowballing. Research happened within the a lab. Members finished the gender salience scale, new blended-intercourse anxiety size and you may said the market background. Every tips was indeed exhibited within fresh English words once the English is the average off training to own tertiary studies during the Hong-kong. This research was carried out in accordance towards recommendations and you will recognition of your own School out of Hong kong Person Browse Ethics Panel (HKU HREC). Most of the subjects provided written told consent in accordance with the Declaration from Helsinki. Adult concur wasn’t required by the latest HKU HREC for it try.

School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).

Table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, how to see who likes you on lavalife without paying p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.

Sex salience scale.

Intercourse salience is actually measured by the exact same approach used in Investigation 1. The newest inter-rater precision is good for every responses (? ranging from .87 to help you .99).

Percentage of almost every other-gender best friends scale.

Part of almost every other-sex close friends are counted because of the same strategy used in Study step 1. Portion of other-gender friends was not reviewed about college decide to try.

Mixed-sex nervousness scale.

As in Research step one, members claimed its mixed-intercourse stress with the modified relationship nervousness scale (DAS-A) . In contrast to Research 1, members in Study 2 completed an entire 21-product kind of DAS-A where matchmaking feel try common from the school shot (93.4% of members advertised a global relationships sense; come across a number of matchmaking experience facts on Dating Background Survey inside the Dining table D within the S1 File). Those who got never ever old before have been requested to imagine just how they will end up being and you may work in the revealed points. For it full-scale, 10 points mentioned Anxiety about Bad Comparison, eight points measured Personal Stress in the Dating Products, five points counted Personal Distress when you look at the Blended-sex Groups, and four filler things offered some slack from rating anxiety-related products. The interior consistency are best for complete DAS-A (? = .95), Concern about Negative Review (? = .92), Social Stress for the Relationship (? = .89), and Public Stress when you look at the Mixed-intercourse Groups (? = .80). While the our focus wasn’t just with the relationship nervousness and simply dos.6% of college or university participants stated which have no heterosexual appeal at all, i incorporated all of the players regarding data away from mixed-gender nervousness and controlled for sexual direction.